Do you think so? I would have thought that there are plenty of men writing about the lives and men and being read by men. I’m not sure whether the substantive difference this all implies really exists. Or whether it should do. Nor am I uninterested in reading about men, just as would like to think there are men who find books written about women worth reading. Why separate them this way? I do understand the historical need, but I’m not convinced it is still helpful.